Comments on: 10 Reasons Why Murray Won’t Win Wimbledon http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/ Your News Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:56:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: benny.henson http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/comment-page-1/#comment-245 benny.henson Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:47:04 +0000 #comment-245 Why did Murray lose to Roddick? Murray's strength was not enough to defeat the American. His serve simply could not compete with Roddick's. Murray started to lose, then he let his anger get the better of him which caused further unforced errors. By the fourth set, Murray looked drained and exhausted, he didn't have the stamina to go the distance. Benny Henson Why did Murray lose to Roddick?

Murray’s strength was not enough to defeat the American. His serve simply could not compete with Roddick’s. Murray started to lose, then he let his anger get the better of him which caused further unforced errors. By the fourth set, Murray looked drained and exhausted, he didn’t have the stamina to go the distance.

Benny Henson

]]> By: Anonymous http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/comment-page-1/#comment-235 Anonymous Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:33:58 +0000 #comment-235 Could have been thought about better than you wrote it. I can only think of one reason that Murray may not win - Roger Federer. Could have been thought about better than you wrote it.
I can only think of one reason that Murray may not win – Roger Federer.

]]> By: Anonymous http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/comment-page-1/#comment-233 Anonymous Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:34:03 +0000 #comment-233 It's a self-fulfilling prophecy with regard to the rankings. If Andy beats Federer in the final he will be the No. 1 in the world rankings. Does that mean he will be favourite for all future tournaments when Nadal is fit? It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy with regard to the rankings.

If Andy beats Federer in the final he will be the No. 1 in the world rankings. Does that mean he will be favourite for all future tournaments when Nadal is fit?

]]> By: Anonymous http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/comment-page-1/#comment-226 Anonymous Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:49:53 +0000 #comment-226 He's got potential, but he's just not quite up there at the moment. Maybe once Federer's gone (or maybe Nadal too), he will def's win a major. He’s got potential, but he’s just not quite up there at the moment. Maybe once Federer’s gone (or maybe Nadal too), he will def’s win a major.

]]> By: Anonymous http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/comment-page-1/#comment-228 Anonymous Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:21:04 +0000 #comment-228 I truly agree with what the article has presented to me. It is true that Federer ****s his ass in finals (eg. Bangkok - 4 years ago and US Open - last year). Choking is also a big factor, just take a look at French Open this year - Gonzalez absolutely caned his ass even though he was playing quite poorly most of the time - and Murray took a nice set off him in the 2nd set, but then his wheels suddenly fell off! Anger management - a massive issue to Murray, I reckon, one of the main reasons why he's been kept in the dark when it comes to Grand Slams. I'm not so sure about his strength - he's quite solid in that area, although yes, consistency is a real problem. His playing style is also a problem, it's just way too predictable when it comes down to important tournaments - especially Grand Slams. So yeah, these factors give me enough evidence that NO!!! Murray is def's not going to win Wimbledon 2009!!! But that's not to say that he won't ever win a Grand Slam in his flowering career. I truly agree with what the article has presented to me. It is true that Federer ****s his ass in finals (eg. Bangkok – 4 years ago and US Open – last year). Choking is also a big factor, just take a look at French Open this year – Gonzalez absolutely caned his ass even though he was playing quite poorly most of the time – and Murray took a nice set off him in the 2nd set, but then his wheels suddenly fell off! Anger management – a massive issue to Murray, I reckon, one of the main reasons why he’s been kept in the dark when it comes to Grand Slams. I’m not so sure about his strength – he’s quite solid in that area, although yes, consistency is a real problem. His playing style is also a problem, it’s just way too predictable when it comes down to important tournaments – especially Grand Slams. So yeah, these factors give me enough evidence that NO!!! Murray is def’s not going to win Wimbledon 2009!!!

But that’s not to say that he won’t ever win a Grand Slam in his flowering career.

]]> By: Anonymous http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/comment-page-1/#comment-225 Anonymous Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:22:52 +0000 #comment-225 Andy Murray has choked at the Grand Slams a lot. Andy Murray also has anger managment issues. He hits his racquet with his fist when he gets angry. He did that when he was facing Kendrick and started bleeding. The guy needs to be more professional. Plus Federer sucks. Andy Murray has choked at the Grand Slams a lot. Andy Murray also has anger managment issues. He hits his racquet with his fist when he gets angry. He did that when he was facing Kendrick and started bleeding. The guy needs to be more professional. Plus Federer sucks.

]]> By: Anonymous http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/comment-page-1/#comment-223 Anonymous Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:34:31 +0000 #comment-223 Such a negative article. The only credible 'reason' is Federer. Why can't we get behind Murray instead of slating him? He didn't get to number 3 in the world for no reason, he must be doing something right. Such a negative article. The only credible ‘reason’ is Federer. Why can’t we get behind Murray instead of slating him? He didn’t get to number 3 in the world for no reason, he must be doing something right.

]]> By: Anonymous http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/comment-page-1/#comment-198 Anonymous Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:18:10 +0000 #comment-198 I'm a Murray fan and I think he's got a good chance of winning but if he plays Federer in the final then oops. If Fed wins then he will be world number 1 again and he won't let that slip. Sorry Andy. Better luck next time mate. I’m a Murray fan and I think he’s got a good chance of winning but if he plays Federer in the final then oops.

If Fed wins then he will be world number 1 again and he won’t let that slip. Sorry Andy.

Better luck next time mate.

]]> By: Anonymous http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/comment-page-1/#comment-143 Anonymous Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:36:52 +0000 #comment-143 plenty of arguments one could make for Andy Murray not winning Wimbledon. Almost all of the reasons in this argument, however, are ridiculous. plenty of arguments one could make for Andy Murray not winning Wimbledon. Almost all of the reasons in this argument, however, are ridiculous.

]]> By: Anonymous http://gnews.com/10-reasons-why-murray-wont-win-wimbledon-01200926063623/comment-page-1/#comment-139 Anonymous Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:10:36 +0000 #comment-139 I don't know where you get your info from. Yoda owns at tennis. I don’t know where you get your info from. Yoda owns at tennis.

]]>